Hong Kong protests: What changed at Mong Kok?
Why are the authorities cracking down now?
Since the street occupations began in
September in three key spots - Mong Kok, Admiralty and Causeway Bay
- the authorities have largely tolerated protesters.
But the High Court began granting
injunctions to businesses and industry groups to clear roads in November,
triggering a round of clearances by bailiffs and the police.
The first clearance in Admiralty on 18
November passed off peacefully.
But clashes erupted the following week when
the authorities demolished the entire Mong Kok camp.
Student protesters accused the police of
violence, and tried to shut down government offices in Admiralty on 1 December,
prompting a strong response from the police.
Another injunction has been granted to
clear a section of Connaught and Harcourt
Roads - the major stronghold of protesters.
The students have insisted that public
opinion is still on their side, but the numbers at protest sites and polls
indicate that the public has grown increasingly weary of the disruption and
unrest.
At its peak, the pro-democracy movement saw
tens of thousands of Hong Kong residents from
all walks of life take to the streets. Two months on, just a few hundred remain
camped out in tent cities, most of whom are students and young workers.
Meanwhile, a mid-November poll done by the University of Hong Kong 's public opinion programme
found that a majority of respondents did not support the protests.
A majority also backed the Hong Kong government's clearance of the sites, though
some believed that it could allocate other areas for protesters.
Student leaders have also found it
difficult to make headway. Earlier talks with city officials proved fruitless,
an attempt to travel to Beijing was blocked by Hong Kong authorities, and two leaders - Joshua Wong and
Lester Shum - were arrested for obstructing police in Mong Kok and are now out
on bail.
On 2 December, three of the co-founders of
the Occupy Central movement called for protesters to retreat. The three turned
themselves in to a police station the next day, though the authorities have not
charged them with any offence.
What is the Chinese government saying?
One of the Hong Kong
business groups that has taken out an injunction to clear the protest sites is
a joint-venture controlled by Chinese state-owned Citic Group.
Though it remains unclear whether Beijing had a direct hand in the applications, many in the
business sector - which is increasingly reliant on China
- have opposed the protests since day one, on the grounds that it would hurt
the economy and anger Beijing .
Structure of The Lead:
What---the street occupations in Hong Kong
When---in September
Who---the students, young workers and residents in Hong Kong
Why---the authorities moved in to clear protest camps
Where---Hong Kong
Keywords:
1. granting---發放
2. injunctions---禁令
3. triggering---觸發
4. clearances---間隙
5. bailiffs---法警
6. demolished---拆除
7. allocate---分配
8. obstructing---阻礙
9. reliant---信賴的
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-29054196
After Hong Kong protests broke out, lots of people said " Hong Kong today, Taiwan tomorrow."
回覆刪除I don't understand! China is big enough and it still want to seize every little land.
Maybe the truth is that if Hong kong succeeded, other provinces will want to rebel against China.
I think Chinese politicians are too selfish. Because they want strong power, they damage the future of China. They never put themselves in their people's shoes. They also use education to control their people's thoughts. Everyone has their own freedom.
回覆刪除They deprived of their rights undoubtedly.
China should listen to other voice from the civics. They should not always make decision on their own.
回覆刪除I think China government should be responsible for this whole event. Hong Kong should govern themselves instead of the China. China should keep their words.
回覆刪除